Patrik Fältström wrote: > What I hear on this list is that the consensus is that BOM SHOULD NOT be > used. I would like it to be MUST NOT be used in Internet protocols, > which leads to tagged UTF-8 text be illegal if the BOM exists in the text. That would violate the Unicode standard. If UTF-8 is clearly indicated with some charset label, then an initial sequence of ef bb bf must be interpreted as the character U+feff ZWNBSP. Since that is not a very useful character at the beginning of a text, it can usually be ignored. Personally, I find François' text very clear. It acknowledges existing, reasonable and useful practice. Best regards, markus -- Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted.Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 12:14:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:54 GMT