you didn't answer the other half of my question: > Are there applications (not toolkits) today that have committed > to converting to use of BOCU-1? If Unicode was to replace SCSU with BOCU-1, thus keeping the set of Unicode encodings that "someone" recomments constant, I wouldn't worry.....but Unicode is still sticking with SCSU. (that said, unless someone else feels unhappy about adding One More Encoding, I think it's probably not a big deal to approve it.) Harald --On 25. juli 2002 14:17 -0700 Markus Scherer <markus.scherer@jtcsv.com> wrote: > Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > >> The approver has a hard time seeing that the added value over SCSU and >> UTF-8 is enough to be "significant". > > > Mark replied to this. > >> Is the Unicode Consortium considering adding BOCU-1 to its >> specifications? > > > It thought it sufficiently significant to add a reference to BOCU > into the SCSU spec http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr6/ > where it is mentioned with the same advantages over SCSU that Mark listed. > > markus > > >Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 07:29:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:53 GMT