Chris Newman wrote: > However, I do object to the following two aliases: >> ISO_8859-1:1987 IBM819 IBM-819 >> ANSI_X3.4-1968 IBM367 IBM-367 Well, fact is that a) There are already a number of aliases for these charsets that implementations have to deal with. b) There is a large installed base of software for (and of) IBM operating systems and middleware that use the numeric IDs 819 and 367 and tend to prepend "IBM-" to all IDs for interoperation with open-standards systems. Although these charsets are among the most important and most widely used, it seems artificial to limit the use of aliases only for these two. markusReceived on Tuesday, 6 August 2002 11:12:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:53 GMT