Kenneth Whistler wrote: > And I don't like any application of the term "repertoire" here, > because that has an orthogonal application to the repertoire of > abstract characters encoded. Thus the "repertoire" for Unicode > changes with each extension for a new version. The range of > accessible code points, however, does not, and constitutes an > architectural constant. Good point. Changed to "If the range of character numbers is restricted to U+0000..U+10FFFF (the UTF-16 accessible range),..." -- FrançoisReceived on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 23:04:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Monday, 12 September 2005 15:53:26 GMT