RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00

David Hopwood écrit :
> I suggest:
> 
> [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard", 
> Versions 2.0 and
> later. <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/>.
> 
> [UNICODE-3-2] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, 
> Version 3.2",
> defined by [UNICODE-3-0] as amended by [UAX27] and [UAX28].
> <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/enumeratedve
> rsions.html
> #Unicode_3_2_0>.
> 
> [UNICODE-3-0] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, 
> Version 3.0",
> Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-61633-5.
> 
> [UAX27] The Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Standard Annex #27: 
> Unicode 3.1",
> May 2001. <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr27>.
> 
> [UAX28] The Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Standard Annex #28: 
> Unicode 3.2",
> March 2002. <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr28>.

Why is that b etter than what we currently have?

-- 
François