At 08:43 02/04/12 +0200, Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B‹N(B wrote: >--On 2002-04-12 15.15 +0900 Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote: > > > We could just point to Unicode 3.2, or to ISO. But we need > > the RFC anyway. > >In the IETF we normally point to ISO if possible. Sorry, I think I should have written 'and' rather than 'or'. >So, I, as AD, prefer a reference to the ISO standard. I think we should reference both, but ISO may be normative. Referencing both is important to tell people that the definitions are the same; otherwise, we don't help implementers. Regards, Martin.Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 03:26:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Monday, 12 September 2005 15:53:26 GMT