- From: IANA <iana@icann.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:53:56 -0700
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf-charsets@iana.org
Harald, Does this seem OK with you? If so, I will take care of this. Thanks, Michelle IANA -----Original Message----- From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 8:17 PM To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand; IANA; ietf-charsets@iana.org Subject: RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes) Hello Michelle, Harald, Many thanks for your quick answers. Currently, the entries look like Name: ISO_8859-6-E [RFC1556,IANA] MIBenum: 81 Source: RFC-1556 Alias: csISO88596E I think Harald is proposing to change that to Name: ISO-8859-6-E [RFC1556,IANA] MIBenum: 81 Source: RFC-1556 Alias: csISO88596E i.e. just changing the _ to a - in the Name. Given that these entries have been around in the present form for a long time, I would prefer to add the correct label as an alias, and keep the current Name, as follows: Name: ISO_8859-6-E [RFC1556,IANA] MIBenum: 81 Source: RFC-1556 Alias: csISO88596E Alias: ISO-8859-6-E (preferred MIME name) The other three entries then would look as follows: Name: ISO_8859-6-I [RFC1556,IANA] MIBenum: 82 Source: RFC-1556 Alias: csISO88596I Alias: ISO-8859-6-I (preferred MIME name) Name: ISO_8859-8-E [RFC1556,Nussbacher] MIBenum: 84 Source: RFC-1556 Alias: csISO88598E Alias: ISO-8859-8-E (preferred MIME name) Name: ISO_8859-8-I [RFC1556,Nussbacher] MIBenum: 85 Source: RFC-1556 Alias: csISO88598I Alias: ISO-8859-8-I (preferred MIME name) Regards, Martin. At 00:12 01/06/17 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: >--On 16. juni 2001 08:02 -0700 IANA <iana@icann.org> wrote: > >>Dear Martin, >> >>Apologies that this was never taken care of. Olle's request came >>through before I came on board. >> >>Harald, is any approval required to make these changes? >> >>Am I correct in understanding that the charset file should appear as >>follows: > >No - dash in the wrong place. >> >>Name: ISO_8859-6-E [RFC1556,IANA] > >The NAME needs to change to ISO-8859-6-E to be consistent with the RFC. >The error was done when transcribing the names from RFC 1556 to the IANA >registry. > >>MIBenum: 81 >>Source: RFC1556 >>Alias: csISO88596E >> >>Name: ISO_8859-6-I [RFC1556,IANA] >>MIBenum: 82 >>Source: RFC1556 >>Alias: csISO88596I >> >>Name: ISO_8859-8-E [RFC1556,Nussbacher] >>MIBenum: 84 >>Source: RFC1556 >>Alias: csISO88598E >> >>Name: ISO_8859-8-I [RFC1556,Nussbacher] >>MIBenum: 85 >>Source: RFC1556 >>Alias: csISO88598I >> >> >>: Examples of new character sets for bi-directionality support: >>: >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO_8859-6-e >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO_8859-6-i >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO_8859-8-e >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO_8859-8-i >>: >>: The "i" suffix refers to implicit mode and the "e" suffix refers to >>: explicit mode. >> >>Please confirm that this is correct. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Michelle Schipper >>IANA >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] >>Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 2:15 AM >>To: ietf-charsets@iana.org >>Cc: iana@iana.org; Harald Tveit Alvestrand >>Subject: Never too late to fix a problem! >> >> >>Having a look at the charset registry >>(http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets), >>I just rediscovered the following error, already >>reported by Olle Jarnefors in 1996! >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-charsets/1996JulDec/0000.html >> >>What is the right way to fix such problems once and for all? >> >>Regards, Martin. >> >> >>Date: Mon, 08 Jul 1996 18:23:30 +0200 >>From: Olle Jarnefors <ojarnef@admin.kth.se> Subject: Errors in charset >>registrations for Arabic and Hebrew >>To: iana@isi.edu >>Cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM, ilan-h@taunivm.tau.ac.il, >>Message-id: <9607081623.AA19350@mercutio.admin.kth.se> There are four >>small but significant errors in the >>registrations of four charset values for Arabic and >>Hebrew character sets defined in RFC 1556. >><ftp:ftp.is.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets> includes the >>registrations: >> > Name: ISO_8859-6-E [RFC1556,IANA] >> > MIBenum: 81 >> > Source: RFC-1556 >> > Alias: csISO88596E >> > > Name: ISO_8859-6-I >>[RFC1556,IANA] > MIBenum: 82 >> > Source: RFC-1556 >> > Alias: csISO88596I >> > Name: ISO_8859-8-E >>[RFC1556,Nussbacher] > MIBenum: 84 >> > Source: RFC-1556 >> > Alias: csISO88598E >> > > Name: ISO_8859-8-I >>[RFC1556,Nussbacher] >> > MIBenum: 85 >> > Source: RFC-1556 >> > Alias: csISO88598I >>RFC 1556, however, uses "-", not "_", after "ISO" in the >>charset values: >>: Examples of new character sets for bi-directionality support: >>: >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-6-e >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-6-i >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-8-e >>: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-8-i >>: >>: The "i" suffix refers to implicit mode and the "e" suffix refers to >>: explicit mode. >>Best regards >>/Olle >>-- >>Olle Jarnefors, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) >><ojarnef@admin.kth.se> --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w) >> >> > > > >
Received on Monday, 18 June 2001 15:58:08 UTC