W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-charsets@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32(B

From: Martin Duerst(B <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:52:17 +0900
To: (wrong string) S(B
Cc: (wrong string) S(B
Message-id: <4.2.0.58.J.20010526095040.05f15ae0@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp> 
At 19:15 01/05/20 +0200, Keld J$BS(Bn Simonsen wrote:
>You really should not do this. UCS-4 is the canonical representation of
>10646. UTF-32 would be misleading, as the UCS-4 is not a transformation 
>format,
>but the "real thing".

Which one? Little endian? Big endian? Or some cris-cross version?

Regards,   Martin.
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 20:58:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:51 GMT