W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-charsets@w3.org > January to March 1999

RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 10:03:04 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
Message-id: <000f01be5068$9cb0b5c0$ab51cac6@copper.parc.xerox.com>
Appendix F of the XML specification


makes it clear that BOM isn't actually necessary for auto-guessing
of charset between UTF-16LE and UTF-16BE, because of the differing
encodings of "<" and "?" in the initial "<?".

I might suggest that the XML recommendation be amended to disallow
charsets that cannot be recognized using the mechanisms included
in Appendix F; however, I'm not sure there are any already registered.

Received on Thursday, 4 February 1999 13:05:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:52:16 UTC