- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 10:02:29 +0900 (JST)
- To: borka@e5.ijs.si (Borka Jerman-Blazic)
- Cc: mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, borka@e5.ijs.si, Lueko.Willms@t-online.de, ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM, iab-charsets@bunyip.com
> > I'm afraid you misunderstand a digital signature is a pictorial > > signature. > > No, in the certificate context, which is binding of your public > key to your name or RDN. That's nothing. > > What is important is just a public key, just a number, of the issuer, > > which will be reliably distributed through ASCII-only secure DNS. > Who will guarntee that the public key announced is really yours or Proper DNS hierarchy. > you will use for ever the ASCII version of your > name? For DNS? Or, for my name printed on airline ticket or passport? Of course, I will. > p.s I do not want to continue this discussion, this is my > last message. I know that you don't like the conclusion that ISO 8859/ISO 10646 are internationally useless. Masataka Ohta --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Thursday, 13 June 1996 18:13:59 UTC