RE: 10646 and progr.languages

> This is a forward message from sc22wg20 mailing list. It shows what
> SC22 people think about (at least some of them) about ISO 10 646/
> natural languages.

It seems to me that they are talking about unnatural languages.

For what purpose SC22 is chartered?

> >Forty(40) is untenable.  C and C++ are case sensitive so the Abc and
> >ABC are different variables.

External symbol of ANSI C could be case insensitive. Is the behaviour
different in ISO C?

						Masataka Ohta

--Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)

Received on Friday, 12 November 1993 06:26:47 UTC