RE: Unicode progress from Masataka Ohta on 1993-10-27 (ietf-charsets@w3.org from October to December 1993)

From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1993 22:15:00 +0900 (JST)
To: jerman-blazic@ijs.si (Borka Jerman-Blazic)
Cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM
Message-id: <9310271315.AA04461@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>

> I am strongly against the discussions related to the ISO issues on
> how UNICODE or ISO 10 646 was voted or developed.

> No one can claim what exactly happen,

Thank you for admitting the inappropriateness and invalidity of your
mails on ISO issues.

According to your suggestion, I politely ignore various incorrectness
in the rest of your mail on ISO issues on how UNICODE or ISO 10 646 was
voted or developed.

I'll be quite happy if such confusing explanations as yours never seen in
this ML.

							Masataka Ohta

PS

To reduce the noise level, this mail is not directed to WNILS.

--Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)

Received on Wednesday, 27 October 1993 06:23:31 UTC