W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > http-caching-historical@w3.org > February 1996

Re: Revised "Range:" proposal

From: Cynthia Clark <cclark@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 13:47:46 -0500
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: mogul@pa.dec.com, http-caching@pa.dec.com, internet-drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, cclark@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-Id: <9602211348.aa25481@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>


Since I'm not sure if you mean changing from 
"draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-02.txt"  OR 


"draft-ietf-http-range-retrieval-00.txt" ???

Please be more specific with the filename, thanks.



 -----  Forwarded Message  ------

To: mogul@pa.dec.com
CC: http-caching@pa.dec.com, internet-drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-reply-to: Jeffrey Mogul's message of Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:08:10 -0800 <9602210108.AA10525@acetes.pa.dec.com>
Subject: Re: Revised "Range:" proposal
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Fake-Sender: masinter@parc.xerox.com
Message-Id: <96Feb20.193227pst.2733@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 19:32:19 PST

Since the byte range draft is now a 'committee' work, I suggest you
name this


and add a header that says that "A subgroup of the HTTP working group
has developed this after several rounds of discussion. Some but not
all parts of this proposal are currently implemented in commercial web
servers and browsers."
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 1996 19:14:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:55:57 UTC