Ordered 'opqque' validators

In prior discussions of opaque validators, someone suggested that
opaque validators should have an order property for the case where
a client is utilizing multiple caches which may not be synchronized.

Hence via proxy-A the client may receive the resource with
validator BCX and later check if still BCX is still OK to server
but ask proxy-B.  Proxy-B may have an out of date validator but
have no way of knowing.

After discussion in todays subgroup meeting, Jeff Mogul suggested
that the Date: header value could be used in conjunction with
the validator to establish the order.

On the surface, other than the possiblity that the Date: would
not have sufficient granularity and hence cause an unproductive
IF-VALID RTT, this seems OK. Does this seem reasonable?

If so, then the working notes draft proposal needs to be 
updated to describe the use of date: to establish order.

Dave Morris

Received on Saturday, 3 February 1996 07:43:16 UTC