I believe it is. In all versions of HTML, the basic set of Latin 1 named entities are supported. A missing DOCTYPE shouldn't preclude their use. Starting with HTML 4, a large number of additional named entities are supported. These should probably be allowed only for markup identified as (and perhaps verified to actually be) HTML 4 or later. The code to determine the version level of a particular entity is not included in Tidy Classic, so I think the code is defaulting to known safe behavior in all browsers. I added entity version info to TidyLib. So, technically, this would be an enhancement request. take it easy, Charlie At 05:15 PM 12/4/2002 +0000, Riccardo Cohen wrote: >by the way, is this a bug in tidy, or is it normal that without doctype, >é cant be generated ? (from my point of view this behavior is not >normal, but I dont know very well standards) >Thanks > > >Charles Reitzel wrote: > > Dang. I didn't know that! Thanks for letting me know. > > Glad you were able to get it working. > > > > I updated the FAQ for --doctype to note that "omit" > > implies --numeric-entities yes. > > > > > > At 11:00 AM 12/4/2002 +0000, Riccardo Cohen wrote: > > >I gave you the config file extracted from html-kit > > >with no change. That's why some options were not found. > > >I tried to run tidy with no config file, and é > > >worked. > > >I tried to locate the option that make it wrong, and > > >found it ! : there was "doctype: omit" !!!Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 11:45:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:21:32 GMT