Charlie said In XML, since "<empty></empty>" and "<empty />" are semantically equal, I would say convert them. The only place I can see this being a problem for someone running an XML document through tidy might not expect it to make this kind of change. I would be pleasantly surprised if it did this but some might not. I hate to say it, but maybe there should be an option that would default to creating the "<empty />" elements. The drawback is recent browser handling of certain XHTML elements. One we have discussed before is <script src="..." /> in the <head> section. This should be equivalent to <script src="..."></script> but many browsers don't handle it correctly. An option would be fine (and probably useful) but I think the default should be to not to convert. Rick Parsons Bristol, EnglandReceived on Friday, 12 July 2002 03:46:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:52 GMT