On 22 Feb 2002, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Tidy not telling me that it changed > into > means that I have no > way of telling if I have written good HTML or not. It is very > important to me to know if I am careless enough to put raw >'s into a > file... I thought that I am skilled enough in HTML to make my own > >'s . If a > gets through then it was probably a typo and I want > to know about it right away, instead of it getting swept under the > carpet to sit embarrassingly on my web page for months. > > So, neatening the blanks, wrapping, etc. is fine and I don't need to > be told about that. However, let's say the postman is so nice that he > corrects addressing mistakes and adds extra stamps needed for my > letters, but is too courteous to tell me. I want to be told! Add an > option! There is another reason for a tidy comment to be helpfull here: Often the string <br or p> were meant to be html tags but a typo occured. A similar thing can be said for entities where & is transformed to &amp ... Here, a tidy comment could be usefull. For me I would like to have an option which I can switch on that tells me when tidy parses entities in one coding but prints them out in a second coding. -- Cheers alex Alexander Biron Support the ban of Dihydrogen Monoxide: http://www.dhmo.org/ /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign \ / --------------------- http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/~biron/ X against HTML mail Tel (+49)33762-7-7516 / \ and postings mailto:alexander.biron@desy.deReceived on Friday, 22 February 2002 04:08:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:51 GMT