W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: Re: Ignoring tags in Jtidy (Developers/maintainers, please comment)

From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:48:02 +0200
Message-ID: <E657D8576967CF448D6AF22CB42DD2690FF1A9@ermhs.Athens.BrokerSystems.gr>
To: <html-tidy@w3.org>

> Message-ID: <3BF80343.9050108@aqiii.org>
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 13:51:47 -0500
> From: Hans Deragon <deragon@aqiii.org>
> To: Lee Passey <lee@dysfunctionals.org>
> CC: html-tidy@w3.org
> Subject: Ignoring tags in Jtidy (Developers/maintainers, 
> please comment)
> 
> Bingo!  You gave me a major clue.  I have added a new tag type:
> 
>   new-ignored-tags
> 
> and it works, at least in a body tag (I will generalize it later).
> None of the current tag definition did what I wanted.
> 
> So, developers (maintainers of Jtidy, tidy, etc..), what do 
> you think about
> adding this feature in the main tree?  Please provide me your 
> comments.

My humble opinion is that Jtidy should just make unknown tags well
formed, as long as they have a namespace prefix associated with a
namespace declaration in a correct context within the document.

Another subject I am up against at this time is dealing with (X)HTML
fragments (see my fragments post).

Kindest regards,

Manos (not subscribed!)
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 04:46:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:46 GMT