W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Script tags

From: Mark Renouf <mrenouf@sparecycles.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 16:19:03 -0500
Message-ID: <3A7B2447.8070301@sparecycles.net>
To: html-tidy@w3.org
Yes I came across that workaround, but it's a kludge.
*
Steps to reproduce:*

tidy a file with

    <SCRIPT language="javascript" type="text/javascript" src="foo.js"></script>


and see what you get.

Bertilo Wennergren wrote:

> Mark Renouf:
> 
>> Script tags with src="foo.js" are treated as empty and pruned.
>> I'm looking at the code now to see if it's possible to have tidy leave 
>> them alone if they have the src attribute set. Has anyone looked 
>> into this?
> 
> 
> I've never had this problem. Could you show us an example?
> 
> One simple but hackish way of avoiding the problem could be to add "//" 
> as the only content of such "script" elements.
> 
>> Also, I made a small change to support and output format that works with 
>> UltraEdit (so you can double click the error and be brought to the 
>> correct line). I could put together if anyone's interested.
> 
> 
> I'm interested!
> 
> #####################################################################
>                           Bertilo Wennergren
>                   <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
>                          <bertilow@chello.se>
> #####################################################################
>  
> 
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 16:18:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:45 GMT