"Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu> wrote: >html-tidy@war-of-the-worlds.org wrote: >> What possible reason would you have for empty tags? What are you trying to >> style when there is nothing to style inside the tags? > With DHTML (the DOM) you can add content. Can't the empty tags be inserted themselves in the same manner relative to the position of contentful markup (:before/:after)? AFAIK, the only tags that make sense when empty are TD, TH (which can be made to render as non-empty using CSS), and BODY. Even empty paragraphs make no sense in HTML (how can you reasonably describe nothingness as a paragraph?) except as a presentational abuse of HTML. -- ,=<#)-=# <http://www.war-of-the-worlds.org/> ,_--//--_, _-~_-(####)-_~-_ "Did you see that Parkins boy's body in the tunnels?" "Just (#>_--'~--~`--_<#) the photos. Worst thing I've ever seen; kid had no face."Received on Thursday, 30 March 2000 15:48:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:37:47 GMT