W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > April to June 2000

W3C validator (was: Strict tables)

From: Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@jelks.nu>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 17:02:14 -0400
To: <html-tidy@w3.org>
Bertilo Wennergren wrote:

> PS. Doesn't anyone but me find it strange that the validator at
> w3c does not validate XHTML code, but nevertheless declares it
> valid as long as it's well-formed?

Yes, it is strange.  But you can use the better validator at:


It *does* validate xHTML, has better error messages, has a better interface,
allows direct entry, file uploads, batch mode, etc.

Received on Monday, 5 June 2000 17:03:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:38:47 UTC